A son and heirAfter nearly eight years of barren
marriage, Queen Margaret found herself with child, and in February 1453 announced the
joyful news. There was jubilation in the Lancastrian faction. If it should be a boy, then
all the pretensions of Richard, Duke of York, to the Throne would disappear. If it was a
girl, then there may have been some trouble in finding her a suitable husband when the
time came, but she would still be the heir to the Throne, and Richard could still forget
that he had any claim to it.
The Yorkists lost no time in casting doubt on the child's parentage, and declared that
it must be illegitimate.
There had been rumours that Suffolk had been her lover, but these rumours would no
longer serve the Yorkist cause; Suffolk had been murdered by the seamen in May 1450. [page] Rumours were now circulated that Edmund Beaufort, Duke of
Somerset, had taken Suffolk's place in the Queen's bed, and yet other rumours were put
about that Margaret, on finding the King to be impotent, had taken some lusty knight or
squire of the King's entourage to give her a child as a matter of policy. None of this was
impossible, neither is it to be totally excluded. Margaret was bewitchingly beautiful, and
somebody may have been willing to run the very considerable risks of obliging her. To
engage in adultery with the Queen was considered treason, and the penalties were dire. On
the other hand, the King and the Queen were surrounded by considerable households running
into hundreds of people, and it was almost impossible to obtain the necessary privacy or
discretion. Margaret was far too sensible a person to run the risks of having her child
proven to be illegitimate, or even the lesser risks of blackmail, and thus compromising
for ever the Lancastrian dynasty. Her whole record shows outstanding loyalty to her
husband. The Yorkists might declaim that the child was no:-
"Naturall sone of Kynge Henrye",
but the only real possibility is that the child was the King's, however long he had
taken to beget it.
On 13th October 1453, the Queen gave birth to a handsome son, whom she named Edward. He
showed early and precocious promise of growing into a lusty man, with a greater
resemblance to his grand-father King Henry V than he ever bore to his ninny-like father.
What sort of man he would have become we shall never know. Edward was killed at the battle
of Tewksbury 1471 whilst still in his eighteenth year.
The tenor of the government
After the humiliation of Richard, Duke of York in early 1452, [Chapter ] there could not be any question that the King was obliged
to keep his promises, which he gave in August 1450, to allow Richard a place in the
government. Richard had rebelled, and had been lucky to escape with his life. The faction
of Queen Margaret and Edmund Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, was predominant, and it was only
natural that people sympathetic to the Lancastrian cause should be appointed to the Great
Offices of State.
This was not done on a whole-sale basis which totally excluded those whose sympathies
lay with the House of York, and there was an attempt to balance the government by
including them, but always taking care that their influence was limited. The careful and
conscientious Cardinal John Kemp, hitherto Archbishop of York, was translated to the See
of Canterbury when John Stafford died in May 1452. He was a man who commanded a measure of
respect from both factions, having been in government for nearly a quarter of a century.
More strongly committed to the Lancastrian cause was William Booth, Bishop of Lichfield
and the Queen's Chancellor, who was appointed Archbishop of York. Equally strongly
committed was Nicholas Close, Bishop of Carlisle, who became Bishop of Lichfield, thus
making room for William Percy to become Bishop of Carlisle. This introduced Percy
influence into the Western Marches, which was a stronghold of the Neville family, the
bitter rivals of the Percy Earls of Northumberland. The King's two half brothers, Edmund
and Jasper Tudor, were raised to become Earls of Richmond and Pembroke respectively. It is
true that they caused consternation in 1453 when they evinced strong Yorkist sympathies,
but basically, they were loyal Lancastrians. To balance this, John Tiptoft, Earl of
Worcester, who was a close friend of Richard, became the Treasurer. Overall the influence
on the Council was all Somerset's, and there was no place for Richard, Duke of York.
[Edmund and Jasper Tudor were the sons of the union between Owen Tudor and Catherine of
Valois, the widow Queen of King Henry V see page . Edmund,
who died in 1456, and his Countess Margaret Beaufort were the parents of the future King
Henry VII. Jasper Tudor took his nephew to Brittany to avoid Yorkist vengeance, and shared
his exile before returning to the victory of the battle of Bosworth 1485]
Renewal of the War in France - October 1452
The people of England's former Southern Provinces of France had always thought of
themselves as being ruled by England, and were not taking kindly to their new French
masters. [page ] Whilst ethnically French they had, in marked
contrast to the Normans, grown accustomed to an easy-going English administration and
would have liked it to continue. Although King Charles VII had been careful not to
interfere with their English patterns of trade, they found some other parts of French rule
irksome, and in particular his decree that they, like all other Frenchmen, were liable for
service in the French armies. This was too much, and in March 1452, they dispatched Pierre
de Montferrant, the Souldic de la Trau, and John de Foix, Earl of Kendall, on an embassy
to London to appeal for an expedition to rescue them. They could not have arrived at a
more inopportune moment, because the strife between Richard, Duke of York, and Edmund
Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, was still not settled. [Chapter ]
England may have received their approach favourably, but England did not have the money to
finance an expedition and had no hopes of raising any. There was however another factor
which prevented their mission from being the failure it must otherwise have been.
Philip-the-Good, Duke of Burgundy, now entertained serious misgivings that France,
since her victory in the South, was becoming much too powerful, whilst his own hold on
Burgundy, and in particular on his Flemish territories, was beginning to look precarious.
Already Ghent had rebelled, breaking down her bridges and ringing out the great bell Roland,
the dread tocsin which called men to arms. Other cities could follow suit, and he could
soon have a full scale rebellion on his hands. His relations with the French Court had
deteriorated. King Charles VII much resented Philip's efforts to suborn his restless and
antagonistic son, the Dauphin Louis, from his true allegiance, and further Pragueries
were to be expected. [For the meaning of this expression, see page
] There was no love lost between father and son. Charles was equally angered by Burgundian
efforts to gain the loyalties of Rene, Duc de Bar and the titular King of Sicily and Queen
Margaret of England's father, by filling his empty pocket with gold. Philip had
impoverished Rene by demanding a huge ransom after Rene's capture at the battle of
Bulgneville 1431 [page ] and possibly thought that after so
long, some recompense was due. In any case, Rene ought to be grateful for some coins to
jingle in his pocket. All in all, Philip had done much to annoy Charles. Now it looked as
though the chickens were coming home to roost, and Charles would intervene in Flanders
where France had many ties. It could be disastrous if he did.
It was at this point that Philip's formidable and very able Duchess Isabella reminded
him that he still had many friends in England. Herself a descendant of John of Gaunt,
[page ] she was thus related to King Henry VI, and
knew there was nothing England would like better than to recover her southern French
provinces. England had no money, but Burgundy had plenty. What could be simpler than
financing an English expedition? That would keep the French King busy in the South whilst
Philip restored order in his Flemish territories. Philip agreed, and Isabella's envoys
arrived in London at the same time as Montferrant and Foix.
Queen Margaret and Somerset seized the opportunity with glee. Here was a chance, at
Burgundian expense, to re-establish their tarnished reputations in the eyes of their
subjects. It was true that a younger commander should be appointed, and Richard, Duke of
York, who was only 41 years of age, seemed the most obvious choice. His loyalties were
most suspect, and there was a natural revulsion to allowing him to live down the disgrace
into which he had just fallen. Many other suitable commanders were known to be sympathetic
towards him, and it may have been unwise to furnish them with a large body of troops.
There was however John Talbot, the veteran Earl of Shrewsbury, who had been fighting in
France all his life. John was born in 1388 or 1390 and was thus 63 or 65 years old, an
advanced age for the time. John was known to be loyal, having fallen for Queen Margaret's
beauty the first time he set eyes on her in 1445. He would still do anything for her, and
his name and reputation would raise troops with ease.
All through the summer of 1452, Shrewsbury prepared his expedition. To put the French
off the scent, it was given out that his troops were intended for Calais, although that
City was in no danger. It was then said that he was ordered to deal with the pirates in
the Channel, who were as always a nuisance. On 2nd September 1452, all pretence was
dropped, and he was handed his commission as the King's Lieutenant in Acquitaine. In
mid-October, he landed 3, 000 men at a point on the coast of Medoc which is still
known as 'L, Anse a l'Anglot.'
The moment was very well chosen. Taken by surprise, King Charles VII was able to
dispatch only a small force to the South, and it needed time to arrive on the scene. The
Governor of the City of Bordeaux and the Senechal of Guienne attempted to parley, but the
citizens would not wait and threw open the gates to welcome the English soldiers with open
arms. Overcome with joy, the people of the Bordelais gave a similar welcome to
Shrewsbury's army. Castillon admitted his men, although Fronsac, Bourg and Blaye held out
for the moment. Well pleased with the first results, Shrews-bury halted his campaign for
the winter months, and settled down to wait for the promised reinforcements. These arrived
in March 1453 under the command of his son, also John Talbot, Viscount de L'Isle, and
Lords Moleyns and Camoys. With 5, 000 men under his banner, Shrewsbury felt confident that
he could deal with any French force sent against him.
Although taken by surprise, King Charles VII was not unduly worried, and took time to
assemble a considerable force in which artillery played a prominent part. In June 1453, it
struck hard, rapidly re-capturing Chalais and Gensac. In July 1453, it laid siege to
Castillon with the intention of forcing the English army to fight a pitched battle.
The French preparations were made with great care. Earth ramparts were dug in such a
way that they could both besiege the town and repel any relieving force. The French army
had a considerable number of guns, and most of these were posted behind the earthworks. A
reserve of guns was established in an artillery park from whence it could be rushed to
wherever it was needed. A small force was posted in the Priory de Saint-Florant, the most
likely point of the English approach; its task was to warn of the English advance, to put
up a token resistance, and then to run away, thus tempting the English to follow, when
they would come up against the main French positions. A rear-guard was posted on Mount
Horable to the North-East. Its task was to cover any French retreat, and to act as a
mobile reserve in any other eventuality.
The French plan worked to perfection. On the day of the battle, 17th July 1453, a huge
cloud of dust arose, and acted as a smoke-screen to hide their main positions. The English
advance from Bordeaux first encountered the Priory, whose garrison did all that was
expected of them. Pausing the refresh themselves from the contents of the Priory's
cellars, the English decided on a frontal attack. Prudence would have dictated a mounted
reconnaissance but, rashly, Shrewsbury decided to pursue what looked like an initial
success and press on with a dismounted attack. The French guns fired a salvo which
decimated the English front ranks and the sweating French gunners strove to re-load their
pieces and fire again. Soon the English soldiers were charging up the French earthworks
and engaging in ferocious hand-to-hand fighting before being repelled by the French
soldiers. Time and again they charged, and time and again they were driven back. The
losses began to mount, either from the swords and pikes of the French soldiers or from the
fire of their trusty guns. The day wore on, but still Shrewsbury persisted. What decided
the battle was the attack launched on the English left flank by the French reserve from
Mount Horable. This began to roll up the English line, and the English army was routed.
Soon it fled from the field.
This was the last battle of the several periods of strife which together are known to
history as the 100-years war, which lasted from 1337 to the day at Castillon in 1453.
The English claims to France were forever laid to rest in this battle which is
noteworthy for two other reasons. The use of the French rear-guard on Mount Horable was
one of the very few examples of manoeuvre on the battlefield once battle had been joined,
although manoeuvres before battle were frequent and sometimes very skilful. [Chapter ] The roles of careful preparation on one side, and
reckless bravery with the minimum of preparation on the other, had been reversed since the
epic fight at Agincourt 1415, nearly 40 years before. Truly the French commanders had
learnt the lesson well, and had put it to good effect when they destroyed the English
army. The English losses were very heavy. Besides innumerable losses among the rank and
file, most of their commanders died. They had lead their soldiers from ther front, the
position of greatest danger, and had paid the price for doing so. John Talbot, Earl of
Shrewsbury, was so badly disfigured that his own herald could only recognise him from his
teeth. His son's body was found nearby with so many wounds that it was a marvel that he
was not cut to pieces.
The victorious French army then went on to subdue the rebellious provinces, which put
up such a stern fight that their operations were not completed until the surrender of
Bordeaux in October 1453. The effects of England's previous defeats in France had been
devastating enough to her domestic politics. The loss of the battle of Castillon was
catastrophic, the more so as its news was received in London at a particularly crucial
moment.
Parliament 1453
Parliament was summoned to meet in Reading on 6th March 1453. Although nobody realised
it at the time, it was due to continue until April 1454. Its sittings were not continuous,
and were broken by many prorogation's and adjournments, the main one being from 2nd July
to 12th November 1453. It was during this summer period that the King lost his mind, and
what happened thereafter belongs to a later Chapter. [Chapter
]
It was unusual for Parliament to be called together at the start of the spring and
summer months, when the plague could be expected to disrupt its proceedings. It seems
Reading was chosen because the plague was less likely to wreck its ravages there than in
the Capital, and also the town was much less sympathetic to the Yorkists than was London.
There was thought to be greater loyalty in Reading to the ruling dynasty. No taxation had
been granted since 1449, and the Crown was in dire need of money. It was true that
Burgundy was financing the expedition to the South of France, but some expenses still fell
onto the English Treasury. It would have been useless to call Parliament any earlier,
because the Resumption Statute 1451 [Chapter ]had not been
given sufficient time to prove itself. By now it had, and it was hoped that Parliament
would be suitably impressed.
The Common House was indeed impressed. Previous Resumption Statutes had failed in their
objects, but the 1451 Statute was living up to all the Common House's hopes. Parliament
now considered that it should be as good as its word and, now that resumption was at last
effective, provide the King with the money he still needed. This was the most generous of
all the Parliaments of King Henry VI's reign; tonnage and poundage were granted to the
King for life as were the wool duties. Englishmen were to pay 50/= in place of 40/= the
sack, and foreigners 100/= in place of the previous 63/4=. Taxes on aliens living in
England were substantially increased. A 1/15th and a 1/10th were also authorised, to be
paid in two halves in November 1453 and November 1454. This was Henry's most successful
Parliament, and before they dispersed on 2nd July, he came to the Common House in person
to thank the members.
The Yorkist faction, having being worsted in Richard, Duke of York's rebellion in 1452,
found that their influence in this Parliament was much less pronounced than it had been in
1451. The underlying feeling was very much in favour of the ruling dynasty. The
Chancellor, Cardinal John Kemp, Archbishop of Canterbury, was a sick man, [he died
on 22nd March 1454] so the session was opened by Marmaduke Lumley, Bishop of Lincoln. A
former protege of Suffolk, he was felt to have a safe pair of Lancastrian hands. The
Speaker was Sir Thomas Thorpe, a knight for the Shire of Essex and a known Lancastrian
supporter. He had been ousted from his post in the Treasury by John Tiptoft, Earl of
Worcester, when he became Treasurer, and strongly resented it even though he had since
become a Baron of the Court of Exchequer. If the Yorkists were in any doubt about their
unpopularity, it was demonstrated by the granting of two petitions. The first of these
sought to annul any legal disabilities suffered by the families of Lord Say, William
Crowmer and John Bailey following their condemnation and execution during Jack Cade's
rebellion. [page ] Since these men had not been convicted by
the Royal Courts, but had been murdered by the mob, this can only have been a stalking
horse for the second half of the petition, that a previous petition for the arrest of
Edmund Beaufort, Duke of Somerset and his friends, should be quashed and consigned to
oblivion.
The second petition prayed that all exemptions from the 1451 Resumption Statute in
favour of the Yorkists should be cancelled. It was made very clear that Parliament had
little favour for the Yorkist faction, although in a short while, this was to change.
There was much talk about establishing a corps of archers, 19, 000 strong, to be called
out in case of need. Rather like today's Territorial Army, it seems to have been the
intention that the men should remain in their civilian occupations until they were
required for military service. There was confusion over their exact role. Were they
intended as a pool of reinforcements to Shrewsbury's army in the South of France? Or were
they intended to overawe Richard, Duke of York and his friends from attempting another
rebellion or staging some military coup? Although the number was later reduced to 13, 000,
nothing ever came of the proposal and the corps was never established, so we shall
probably never know what the purpose was. It has been suggested that the whole idea was
the fantasy of historians, but a schedule has survived showing the proposed contributions
of each county. [Appendix ] The suspicion does linger that a Parliament of Lancastrian
sympathies intended to warn the Yorkists to keep the peace and to behave themselves.
July and August 1453
When on 2nd July 1453, each Knight of the Shire and each burgess of the town mounted
his horse and turned its head for home, they must have enjoyed a feeling of some
satisfaction. They were not due to meet again until mid-November, and there seemed little
business which remained.
The Yorkists were now quiet and subdued, and seemed unlikely to start another uprising;
even the rule of Queen Margaret, Somerset and the witless King, much as they detested the
first two, was better than civil strife. After a long and bitter struggle over Resumption,
it seemed the battle was won and the 1451 Statute was working well. If the King needed
more money, they had given it to him. With the Treasury replete once again, many of the
countries ills could be dealt with and would in time disappear. Shrewsbury seemed to be
making good progress in the South of France, and there seemed every prospect of the
recovery of the Southern Provinces. It seemed that at last things had taken a turn for the
better.
Then disaster struck with a double blow. During the latter part of the month, news of
the terrible disaster of Shrewsbury's defeat and death at Castillon reached their ears.
During the summer months, King Henry VI, the countries Chief Executive, lapsed into
madness. Once again, all was in turmoil.
APPENDIX
Numbers of archers to be provided by each county
Parliament March-June 1453
(Rot. Parl. V 232)
| County/Town/Area |
No |
|
County/Town/Area |
No |
| Bedford |
201 |
|
Stafford |
173 |
| Buckingham |
205 |
|
Somerset |
405 |
| Cambridge |
302 |
|
Dorset |
254 |
| Huntingdon |
133 |
|
Surrey |
175 |
| Cornwall |
142 |
|
Sussex |
329 |
| Cumberland |
74 |
|
Southampton (County) |
385 |
| Devon |
284 |
|
Warwick |
236 |
| Essex |
368 |
|
Leicester |
226 |
| Hertford |
183 |
|
Wiltshire |
476 |
| Yorkshire |
713 |
|
Worcester |
149 |
| Gloucester |
424 |
|
Westmorland |
56 |
| Hereford |
130 |
|
Bristol |
91 |
| Kent |
575 |
|
York (City) |
152 |
| Lancaster |
113 |
|
Hull |
50 |
| Lincoln |
910 |
|
Lincoln(City) |
46 |
| Middlesex |
105 |
|
London |
1, 137 |
| Northampton |
346 |
|
Norwich |
121 |
| Nottingham |
200 |
|
Newcastle |
53 |
| Derby |
141 |
|
Southampton (Borough) |
46 |
| Norfolk |
1, 012 |
|
Coventry |
76 |
| Suffolk |
429 |
|
Nottingham(City) |
30 |
| Northumberland |
60 |
|
Durham(Bishopric) |
300 |
| 0xford |
419 |
|
Lords of the Realm |
3, 000 |
| Berkshire |
309 |
|
Wales and Chester |
3, 000 |
| Rutland |
64 |
|
Shropshire |
192 |
|
|
|
|
|