Events in EnglandApart from reinstating King
Henry VI, there was much work to be done, and George, Duke of Clarence and Richard
Neville, Earl of Warwick, had every reason to be grateful to Dr John Morton, and John
Fortescue, the previous Chief Justice who had landed with them in Dartmouth. Hastening to
London, they had occupied themselves with the myriad details of government which had to be
attended to. George Neville, Archbishop of York, was re-appointed the Chancellor. John de
Vere, Earl of Oxford, became the Constable. Sir John Langstrother found himself once again
the Treasurer. Warwick took for himself the office of Lieutenant and Protector of the
Realm until Parliament could meet, and had his position as Captain of Calais confirmed.
All the judges had to be re-appointed. A new coinage had to be struck, this time with King
Henry VI's head upon it; the existing coins would in course of time be gathered in and
re-struck so that even the memory of King Edward IV would fade and forever disappear.
Finally, Summonses and Writs were issued to call Parliament together at Westminster on
26th November.
So much for the civil side. Soon after his own arrival in London, Warwick had had to
take urgent measures to quell disorder in the City. As soon as the news reached the City
that Edward had fled, there was uproar. Some unknown hands had opened the prison gates,
and the criminal element of the populace had taken the opportunity to rob, rape and
murder.
Bands of marauders were roaming the streets, and nobody seemed able to stop them. Some
rioters from Kent joined in, and several of the outlying suburbs beyond the City Walls
were ransacked. Warwick acted ruthlessly in restoring order, and soon the many gibbets
were tenanted by the robbers his men had caught. Even so, armed citizens had to patrol the
streets for some time to reinforce the grim warning that the dangling corpses gave to
anybody who was disposed to break the King's Peace.
Warwick was under no illusions about his difficulties.
He now served an imbecile King who was totally incapable of using the Royal Power, and
who was rather unkindly, if not totally untruthfully, described as:-
".....a stufted woolsack, a shadow on a wall..... a crowned calf..."
[Chastellain v 490]
and he had himself to exercise the Royal Power without being a crowned and anointed
King. A percipient Spanish correspondent, writing from Bruges on 19th January 1471,
remarked that Queen Margaret could have helped him if only she returned to England. She at
least was a Queen, and her delay in returning was very dangerous. Her return however would
pose other problems, and neither Margaret nor Warwick wanted her to return. As Margaret
saw it, she would have to bring the young Prince Edward with her, and she did not trust
Warwick sufficiently where her son was concerned.
She preferred that the Dukes of Somerset and Exeter, who had shared her exile at
Kouer-La-Petite, should first make their own return, and re-establish themselves to a
sufficient degree to protect the Prince from any designs which Warwick may have on him.
Warwick in his turn was content that Margaret and the Prince should remain out of the
country. The Common People still loathed and distrusted her, and Prince Edward was now 17
years of age; if his father died, he would be old enough to reign in his own right without
a Regency, and he was thus similarly old enough to take over Warwick's own office of
Protector.
Warwick was also aware that both Edmund Beaufort, Duke of Somerset (his title was at
last recognised, something King Edward IV had always refused to do), and Henry Holland,
Duke of Exeter, heartily detested him. Edmund's brother Henry, the previous Duke, had been
beheaded after the battle of Hexham 1464, [page ] and
Edmund had in no way forgotten the feud that had existed between the Beauforts and the
Nevilles for as long as men could remember. Henry Holland had much resented the fact that
Warwick had been a most successful Lord Admiral, whereas he had been singularly
ineffectual. The two Dukes did return in February 1471, bringing with them a large
retinue, principally returning exiles. Exeter set himself up in his huge City mansion in
Coldharbour, from whence he proposed to view the present position. The first piece of news
greatly incensed him; on 2nd January, Warwick had been re-appointed Lord Admiral.
Warwick was further very conscious of possible difficulties with his son-in-law, the
unstable Clarence. A Throne and a Crown had been dangled before George's eyes, only to be
snatched away again. The returning Lancastrian Lords would despise George as a turncoat,
and a prominent member of the loathed clan of York at that, and if they took any notice of
him at all, it would be to demand the return of their lands which George now occupied. He
had held the Post of Lieutenant of Ireland (he had done neither good nor harm there) under
King Edward IV, and he was now re-appointed as a useful bolt-hole. Warwick probably knew,
or at least guessed, that Clarence was under great pressure to return to the Yorkist fold.
His own Mother Cecille, Proud Cis or the Red Rose of Raby and herself a Neville by birth,
never ceased to berate him for the atrocious way he had treated his two brothers. His
three sisters, Margaret Duchess of Burgundy, Anne Duchess of Exeter (a most independently
minded lady, not in the least overawed by her husband's extreme Lancastrian sympathies),
and Elizabeth Duchess of Suffolk added their voices to the chorus that he should come to
his senses. So did his aunt, Isabel, Countess of Essex in the most forthright terms.
William, Lord Hastings, using gentler terms than the ladies had employed, also wrote to
him from his exile in Holland begging him to see the error of his ways. Warwick could see
the necessity of protecting Clarence not only from his enemies, but from himself as well,
but there was a greater worry; unless Clarence's life was made tolerable with offices,
appointments and wealth, he might well decide that he had no other option but to return
whence he had come.
[According to the "Historie", some others added their voices - Cardinal
Thomas Bourchier, Archbishop of Canterbury, "my Lord of Bathe", probably Robert
Stillington, and Henry Bourchier, Earl of Essex]
Parliament duly met on 26th November 1470. Its business was short and to the point,
seeing nothing objectionable in the courses agreed between Queen Margaret and Warwick in
Angers the previous July. The Chancellor, George Neville, had opened King Edward IV's
first Parliament in 1461 with a text chosen from the Book of Jeremiah. He now found
something suitable from the same source:-
"Return, Oh ye revolting children, saith the Lord, for I am your husband; and I
will take you, one of a city, and two of a kindred, and will bring you unto Sion"
King Edward IV was declared a traitor and an usurper, and all his goods and lands were
forfeited. All his Statutes were repealed. King Henry VI was declared the rightful King,
and if the young Prince Edward should die without issue of his own, then Clarence and his
male heirs should succeed. All Acts of Attainder against the Lancastrian Lords were
reversed, but their lands and properties were not immediately restored to them; Warwick,
with an eye to the hostility he could expect from them, was anxious not to dispossess the
present owners on the basis that, if there was trouble, they would have no option but to
support him. Warwick must now share the office of Protector of the Realm with Clarence.
These measures considerably strengthened Warwick's position in an otherwise unpromising
political scene, and it it worth noting which of the Lords were summoned to this
Parliament. All the Prelates were sent summonses as were the Dukes of Norfolk, Suffolk and
Clarence, the Marquis "de Montacute" (obviously John Neville), 7 Earls and 23
Barons.
[Parry - Parliaments and Councils of England p 192] This was well below the usual
number, and the Dukes of Somerset and Exeter, who were at this time still in France, were
not even summoned. Clearly their disruptive influence was not wanted.
The Re-Adeption was not a happy or settled time in England, and the spectre of invasion
hung over everyone and everything. Edward was not the man who would tamely accept the
position, and it was only to be expected that such a vigorous man would, by hook or by
crook, somehow gather together men, money and ships to fight to regain his Crown.
John de Vere, Earl of Oxford and John, Lord Scrope of Bolton, an old Yorkist who had
been badly wounded at the battle of Towton 1461 but an equally old adherent of Warwick's,
watched East Anglia, the point of greatest danger.
John Neville watched the North, whilst Jasper Tudor kept watch in his native Wales.
Warwick himself kept watch in the South. It was a very tense time for Lancaster.
In some quarters, not all was doom and gloom, and at least some were happy. Already on
12th October 1470 John Paston, as greedy and as opportunistic as any member of the
nobility, had written gleefully to his mother that John Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk would
shortly have to disgorge Caistor Castle. When Oxford set himself up once more in his
ancestral Castle of Hedingham in Essex and called his affinity around him, John hastened
to join him and remind him of his grievance. Oxford was delighted to oblige him, and
Mowbray was ordered to hand Caistor Castle back to the Pastons. With even greater glee
John reported how the proud and haughty Duke of Norfolk and his equally formidable Duchess
Elizabeth, who was none other than the daughter of that formidable warrior 'Old Talbot' of
the French Wars, were now forced to bow and scrape before the Earl of Oxford. This gave
John much malicious pleasure.
Events in France and Burgundy
King Edward IV made good his escape from King's Lynn during the last few days of
September 1470. Sailing in an easterly direction and scarcely knowing where they were
going, the three small ships were crammed with men. Commyngs' estimates vary between 800
or 900 and 1500, but these figures seem to be an exaggeration. They were Edward's
followers who felt they had good reason to be fearful of Warwick's vengeance; those who
had no such reason had been left behind. Dressed only in the clothes in which they had
fled from Doncaster, they had scarcely a penny piece between them. Half way across the
North Sea, they fell in with some vessels of the Hansa League which, mistaking them for
English pirates, gave chase. They made for the nearest port to seek safety, and this
happened to be Alkmaar in the Friesian Islands. They were unable to enter on the low tide,
and the Germans closed in menacingly. As luck would have it, Louis de Bruges, Seigneur de
Gruthuyse, the Governor of Holland happened to be in the Town. Gruthuyse was an old
friend, who had once scolded the Scots Queen Mary for supporting Lancaster, [page ] and had since been a member of Burgundian embassies to
London. He had many happy memories of the Yorkist Court. On finding out who was on board
the ships, Gruthuyse promptly went on board himself and sternly bade the Germans to leave
them alone.
Gruthuyse was a generous host to a friend in trouble.
He accommodated Edward and his following in his splendid mansion in Bruges, feeling
that friendship demanded this, and that his Master, Charles-the-Bold, Duke of Burgundy,
would expect him to look after his brother-in-law. Edward was so poor that he could only
give the shipmaster his ermine lined cloak, promising a more fitting recompense at a later
date. Charles' welcome of his brother-in-law was however not quite so effusive, and he
bade Edward to stay away from his Court. The first news to reach him had indicated that
Edward was dead, and according to Commyngs, this did not worry him at all, because he
preferred Lancaster to York. Once he found out that Edward was alive and well and living
in Bruges, he realised that he had a very tricky situation on his hands. As he assured the
Dukes of Somerset and Exeter, who were then at his Court as his guests, he only desired to
live at peace with England within the framework of the existing treaties. Edward's
presence was an unwelcome complication. He steadfastly refused even to consider giving
Edward any help, in spite of the pleadings of his Duchess Margaret, although he did
contribute towards Gruthuyse's expenses of maintaining him.
Charles' prevarication's during the period of the Re-Adeption may be explained by this
almost desperate desire for peace with England, and he may have allowed himself to be
mislead by Commyngs' report on his visit to Calais in October 1470. [Commyngs 1 245-256]
Commyngs had been sent to Calais by Charles, who said that he had urgent need to be served
in this way. It is strange indeed that Charles, who greatly feared Warwick, did not send
an embassy to London to discuss things with the centre-point of the English government,
but was content with a report from an outpost.
Commyngs found that every man in Calais was wearing Warwick's livery. This was not to
be wondered at so far as the soldiers were concerned; Warwick was their Captain.
What was more surprising were the white crosses painted everywhere as emblems of
Warwick's new unity with France.
The senior officer in the Town was still John, Lord Wenlock, and he invited Commyngs to
dine with him and his officers.
All were wearing Warwick's emblem in their caps. Some were fashioned in gold, and those
who had not been so provident wore cloth emblems hastily embroidered by their wives.
Rather shamefacedly, they admitted putting on these emblems as soon as the flight of King
Edward IV became known to them. After their treatment of Warwick the previous April,
[page ] they obviously felt they had some difficult
explanations to give.
Commyngs found that they believed that Edward was dead, and although he well knew that
Edward was still alive, he did not disabuse them. Would England continue to observe the
existing treaties with Burgundy? Assuredly so, answered Wenlock, they were solemn and
binding treaties made between Nations, and were more than mere agreements made between
individuals. Would Burgundy recognise King Henry VI? Certainly, replied Commyngs, Burgundy
would recognise the King whom the English chose.
Charles was overjoyed to receive Commyngs' report. He only wished to conciliate Warwick
and live at peace, and in October 1470 he felt at ease with the situation. His peace of
mind did not last for long. He relied on the Treaty of Peronne, which he had made a few
years previously with King Louis XI, to keep the French in check. This Treaty bound both
France and Burgundy to live at peace, and only recently Louis had shown that he attached
great importance to its terms when Charles had complained about Warwick's piracy. [page] Undeniably, Charles was singularly naive about Louis and the
way that he would probably react to the new circumstances. Louis had an evil name, in
which he took some pride and for which he felt no shame, for his deviousness and for his
habit of breaking his solemnly plighted bargains.
Usually Louis was very cautious in the way that he indulged himself in both these
characteristics, and never entered on any course of deceit without the most careful
consideration.
He had welcomed the return of the friendlier Lancaster in place of the markedly hostile
York, but now he embarked, most rashly, upon a course which was to ensure that Lancaster
could not survive.
To Louis' mind, he had already shown goodwill towards England when, on 14th October, he
had proclaimed the removal of all existing prohibitions on trade with the English. On 13th
November, his embassy, headed by Sir John Monypeny, arrived in London and proposed to
Warwick an offensive alliance against Burgundy. [Waurin - Cronicques ed Dupont iii
199/200] Neither France nor England were to make peace without the consent of the other.
Once Burgundy was subdued, Holland and Zealand were to be Warwick's share of the spoils.
This seems to have taken the English government, still newly fledged and struggling to
find its feet, by surprise. Although Louis had made no secret of his hostility to
Burgundy, or of his desire for revenge on Charles-the-Bold for the part he had played in
the 1465 praguerie which had so humiliated him, no such proposition had been
discussed at Angers in July. Warwick would have told Monypeny that after the recent
upheavals, England was in no position to engage in a foreign war. Maybe she could find a
few soldiers, but politically the country was still in a very parlous state.
There was currently no public support for an attack upon Burgundy, and it was extremely
doubtful if there ever would be. This was borne out when news of what Monypeny was
suggesting reached the ears of the City and the Calais merchants. There was a veritable
storm of protest over the disruption of the wool trade which would ruin not only the
merchants, but also the farmers and their workpeople whose livelihoods depended upon it.
It would be a disaster for the Southern half of the country. Warwick, anxious not to upset
Louis or the wool trade, gave a temporising answer rather than an outright refusal.
Louis regarded this as a poor return for all the help he had given to Lancaster, but he
had another string to his bow. At the end of November, he decreed three days of
thanksgiving in Paris to celebrate Lancaster's return, and naturally Queen Margaret and
her son, Edward, Prince of Wales were invited. Probably the Dukes of Somerset and Exeter,
still at this time in France or Burgundy, were also bidden.
After some magnificent religious services, Louis placed before the callow 17-year old
Prince a treaty of offensive alliance against Burgundy, and invited him to seal it as a
deputy for his father. The Prince, lacking disinterested advice, duly did so on 28th
November. [Commyngs-Lenglet supplement and 89; Waurin ed Dupont iii 52, 59] Thus Warwick's
worst fears for the future of his Protectorship were realised.
Louis then moved swiftly to force the English hand. On 3rd December 1470 he denounced
the Treaty of Peronne, and on the 10th he invaded Burgundian territory, seizing St Quentin
and attacking the towns of Page, Mondidier and Amiens. Charles was now greatly alarmed,
and protested to England that all he wanted was peace. For another month he persisted
before he belatedly realised that his policy of appeasement was not going to work, and
that he must have recourse to other means. In January 1471, he finally sent for Edward.
Edward and his companions in exile had been greatly impressed by all they had seen in
Holland. The magnificent buildings and the beautiful cities with their carefully crafted
canals and their well laid out gardens amazed them. The product of the wealth made by the
trading of the Dutch, the Italians and the Germans who had thronged here to do business in
Bruges, The Hague, Amsterdam and Rotterdam they found overwhelming. They were used to
London, a magnificent City in its own right and one of the foremost cities of Christendom,
but London was essentially a workshop whose din of trade and manufacture never ceased.
Here in Flanders they saw peaceful and gracious living at its best. They only had to enter
the churches to see the paintings of the new breed of masters, particularly Hans Memling,
who were active in the mid 15th-century. These were things they scarcely even knew
existed, and the wealth and power of the citizens astounded them. The books too were
breathtaking in their beauty; copied out on vellum and illustrated with fantastic
miniatures, they more resembled jewels than books. After his exile, Edward began to
collect them. Good music was not unknown to them as Edward liked it and music was one of
the joys of his own Court; Burgundian music however excelled, and was one of the countries
marvels. Not even all this prepared them for the splendours of the Burgundian Court, the
most magnificent of Europe, surpassing even the glittering Court which Edward had kept.
Charles and his Duchess, Edward's own sister, were brilliantly attired, and the courtiers
vied with each other in the splendour of their dress, being always careful never to
outshine the Duke and the Duchess.
Edward and his followers, thanks to the generosity of Gruthuyse, were solemnly and
properly dressed when on 2nd January they appeared at the Burgundian Court. It would never
have done for them to appear before the Duke as the scarecrows who had landed at Alkmaar
three months before.
Charles took Edward to one side, and listened patiently whilst Edward reminded him that
they were brothers of each others Orders, the Goldern Fleece and the Garter, and
reproached him gently for not coming to the aid of a brother in distress as his oath bound
him to do. Charles, equally gently, explained that things were not quite as simple as
Edward made them out to be, but that he was now resolved to help him. The greatest secrecy
of the source of this help must be maintained - Charles must not be seen by Warwick or by
Louis to be giving help to the Yorkist exile. He had a difficult diplomatic game to play,
and it would complicate things for him if his help became public knowledge - he must
always be in a position to deny it. Ships would be chartered to carry Edward and his army
to England by Charles' agents, but if any questions were asked, Charles would disown his
agents activities. Edward was free to start recruiting soldiers and purchasing equipment
for them, and Charles advanced him a huge sum of money for this purpose. Otherwise it was
Edward and Edward alone who was putting this expedition in hand. Charles could not be
involved.
Due to the help Charles had given him, Edward started the process of getting the
expedition ready. Letters were written to the exiles' friends and affinities in England
warning them to be ready. This was a very risky business, because the government
could seize correspondence and things could go very badly for any addressee. It seems
there was no untoward event, and that the letters reached their destinations to give
warning that all must be prepared for Edward's early return. This was particularly true of
William, Lord Hastings' affinity in the Midlands, whose readiness and strength was
to prove crucial to Edward at a dangerous time. Another correspondent appears to have been
Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland. ["Historie of the Arrival of Edward IV in
England" (C.S.)] The Percies had always been Lancastrian sympathisers, but according
to the "Historie", this Percy was to give Edward some very valuable service. [page ] Soon men and ships began to gather in Flushing, and by 2nd
March, everything was ready for Edward to embark. Bad weather and contrary winds prevented
a departure before 11th March, but on that day the wind set fair for England, and the 4
ships belonging to Charles, accompanied by 14 others which had been chartered, set their
sails and steered for East Anglia.
It was originally intended to land at Cromer in Norfolk, but the scouts that Edward
sent ashore advised against it. The Dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk had been ordered to
attend Court so that an eye could be kept on them. Oxford's brother Thomas de Vere had a
considerable force nearby, and was marching to oppose the landing. Setting a northerly
course, Edward headed for the Yorkshire coast. His ships ran into a gale which lasted for
two days, and it was the 14th March before he could land at Ravenspur on the very spot
where, 72 years before, Henry of Bolingbroke had made his own landing.
Six months after he had left as a fugitive, King Edward IV had returned to claim his
Throne. It needed no prescience to see that this would be a desperate fight.